Friday, March 23, 2012



18 comments:

Millie McCutcheon said...

interesting approach to your concept, very effective title and composition which helps us understand the image.

Carmen Ruby said...

The title explains the image, however without it the image makes no sense. The image itself is rather cluttered and too busy.

Lucilla Gray said...

original execution, not sure of relevance of buildings/ city scape. Title helps explain image more clearly

Team said...

The title says more than the image as image is overwhelming and could have been done simplier.

Amelie said...

image is quite cluttered, we kind of get a grasp of the concept from the title but the overall meaning is lost through the image - theres so much going on. the concept you have used is so big and interesting it would be difficult to put it into one photo.

OBriasco said...

Not particularly aesthetically pleasing, quite overwhelming, though we wonder if this was your intention? Title could be the image alone and be more effectively than the image itself. Quite confused by technical aspects of image also

Georges Banach-Salas said...

If you balance these things this equals moderation?

The equation/title is more effective than the image, the image is a bit disjointed and on its own is a very unclear image. Also the 4 separate images are seemingly unrelated and/or it’s hard to tell what they are. We think a simpler image would have conveyed the idea better, perhaps too much is trying to be said at once.

Ho Young Kim said...

Cool title! cool Image!! Good Photoshop!! Well executed. Good Overall photo aesthetic. but if you meant to relate the images still the word moderation is in question.

Georgia Whelan said...

We don't really understand the relationship between the title and the image (because we can't actually recognize what the images are) but the title explained the concept more than anything. The image definitely has a lot going on, but also think that this was meant to be the point?

Heron said...

There's a lack of explanation in the image. Interesting but possibly because its unclear.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ellen Gazdowicz said...

Very confused by this image. The title says more than the image.

Hix said...

Title is a great help to understanding the image, although it still isn't entirely clear. Love the image of the fur in the washing machine though.

Ann said...

Cool image and colouring. The composition and repeating shapes are really lovely - especially the organic circles against a cityscape

The title and photo can be quite confusing, once we got our heads around it a bit better we realised the impact of the issue this group is raising. It was something very interesting which we had not really thought about before - not an obvious fashion issue. We had a good discussion over this - the title helped

Nice to see something very different!

Kristy said...

Fur > factory > Smog? Title helps to increase understanding of concept, but had to look a few times at image to decipher concept. Title made it clearer.

megan.kingdom said...

We don't really see the relation between the title and the image! Really nice quality of the image - we see that you have a strong concept that wasn't shown as effectively in the image as in the title.

Arianna Ponder said...

Title is more thought provoking than image. The image could of been simplified, to clearify concept. Individually images are beautiful.

Helen McMurtry said...

idea of consumption clearly shown by the clutter and busy nature of the image. Like how the cityscape shows mass consumption in a confined environment.